On Monday, many people in class expressed that they found Val’s choices to be unrealistic. I too found some of her choices and thought-processes to be shocking and implausible. Val runs away from home and spends the night in NYC, willingly follows two strangers onto subway tracks to get to their underground hideout, seeks out the lair of a troll, starts taking a mystery drug, and a lot more. Even though Valiant falls under the urban fantasy genre and we expect certain aspects of the setting and certain events of the story to be fantastical, to identify and respond to human characters at all we want motives to be understandable even if they’re not rational. Val’s decision-making process is haphazard and inconsistent with how we would expect humans to be motivated to act. For those of us that find Val’s choices to be unrealistic and off-putting, is there something we all have in common, besides that we are all older than the intended audience for this novel, that makes us find her choices so disconcerting?
Also, without really having a way to know for certain, is Val able to be a relatable character to teen readers in spite of her questionable reasoning? Her reasoning, for that matter, seems to be that any decision she makes is fine as long as she is the one making it. Do teens value autonomy so much that they will overlook the consequence of a decision as long as it was made independently? And if teens do find her more relatable than we might, what, besides age again, makes teens more likely to find her relatable?
Leave a reply to ethanmakulec Cancel reply