It’s October 8th, 2016, and Donald J. Trump’s campaign has been torpedoed by evidence that he believes that he can grab women “by the pussy” without their consent. Those salacious videotaped comments from 2005 have almost instantly cost him the support of much of his own party. I believe that The Donald’s remarks were disgusting, wrong, and misogynistic; but, then again, I’ve been never been a Trump fan.

Yet, I can’t help but attempt to contextually understand Trump’s behavior. My current theory is that Donald Trump is just “of a certain generation” (Think: “Madmen”). This doesn’t make me forgive him, but it does draw an interesting parallel to the discussion our class had last week about consent in the 1975 book “Forever,” by Judy Blume.

Let’s do a quick calculation:  Donald Trump is 70 years old — born in 1946. Judy Blume’s “Forever” was published in 1975, but let’s assume the she started working on it a bit earlier, maybe 1970. Michael, the protagonist’s love interest, is about to turn 18. So, let’s say he was born in 1952. This makes both Trump and Michael early members of the baby-boomer generation. The generation of free love, “Playboy” magazine, and the sexual revolution. Many men of that generation were instilled with objectifying norms and paternalistic attitudes regarding their relationships with women, as demonstrated by Michael’s demands for sex. And as Katherine demonstrates, many women accepted aggressive male sexuality at that time. However, it’s not 1970 anymore. So, here’s my question: Does Forever capture the standards of a sexist age that just won’t die?

2 responses to “Madman”

  1. I think you’re right in highlighting how sexism and hyper masculinity may still exist today. The fact that women still have to fight for their rights (think abortion laws, slut walk, free the nipple) emphasizes that women’s sexuality is not celebrated unless it is convenient for men. Forever does in fact encapsulate some of this, but I feel that if it were to be written today, it would work harder to push against the stigma that is associated with women’s sexuality (like the movements that we see today).

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Whats most interesting to me about your point is that though lack of consent in the novel reveals its sexist attitudes, for its time, the book was boundary pushing. The fact that Micheal even asked for permission to kiss Kat was considered forward thinking at the time shows how Blume’s book was intended as empowering. This is interesting, because we can stand back now and note how this was progressive, but progress has sense been made. So even though in our minds this way of thinking is out-dated, the baby-boomers of Trump’s era are stuck in the “we know that’s what it was like when you were a kid…” but it’s still not acceptable by today’s standards category.

    Like

Leave a reply to akkadala Cancel reply