Animality in Akata Witch

In Akata Witch, one subtle point that I picked up on was Okorafor’s re-imagining of humans’ relationships with non-human animals. Most obviously, Okorafor labels humans with superpowers/special abilities as “Leopard People,” while humans without these powers are titled “Lambs.” Thus, Okorafor’s society creates a distinction in which carnivores/animals higher up on the food chain are considered more powerful and more intelligent than herbivores. Beyond this linguistic exploration, the main characters of the novel also learn important lessons relating to their treatment of animals. Sunny purchases a sheep’s head in order to perform juju, but experiences nausea and disgust when she examines the corpse up close, considering how the sheep’s “yellow teeth would never chew grass again; [their] mouth would never be warmed by [their] breath” (p. 102). This passage is especially relevant, considering the use of the term “Lamb” (a young sheep) for humans without special abilities—Sunny must purchase a dead sheep/lamb and destroy the animal’s corpse in order to perform her juju, similar to how Black Hat kills and destroys the body of young human Lambs in order to perform his magic.

When the group visits Taiwo, they are greeted by Nancy, a “Blue-Footed Miri Bird” (162). Various characters curse Nancy, calling her a “goddamn insane bird,” “filthy,” and “flea-infested” (p. 163). Eventually, Orlu realizes that Nancy wants “what everyone wants: to be treated like a human being” (p. 165). Okorafor’s/Orlu’s word choice here is interesting, given that Orlu recognizes that this non-human animal wants to be treated like a human. In this sense, Orlu acknowledges that non-human animals are NOT treated like human beings, yet “everyone” wants to be treated like humans, suggesting that humanity’s disregard for non-human animals on the basis of their non-humanness is unwarranted. When they reach Taiwo’s room, Taiwo graciously thanks Nancy, and notes that Orlu possesses humility, while the other characters need to learn this lesson. Taiwo states that “all creatures have a place,” and that “all of us could die right now and life would go on,” suggesting that Nancy’s life is perhaps just as important as the lives of the members of the Oha coven (p. 167).

The final passage I noted was when the group discusses the wasp artist living in Sunny’s room. Sasha—one who lacked humility when regarding Taiwo’s Nancy—claims “you shouldn’t be forced to treat anything well…it should be your choice,” suggesting that it is an individual’s choice as to how they treat other beings (p. 295). In contrast, Orlu—the one with humility for Nancy—notes that “not all things are a choice…some things should come naturally,” implying that valuing the lives of all beings should be a natural instinct (p. 295). Furthermore, the depiction of the wasp as a creative artist and an individual who desires the affirmation of their artistic abilities shows non-human animals as individuals with personalities, which is a radically different depiction compared to how non-human animals are described in most books.

Through these passages, Okorafor subtly speaks to the oppression of non-human animals and addresses how this intersects with the oppression of various human groups. I was astounded overall by her novel and the messages she portrays: not only does she weave a complex, creative story of anti-oppression on the basis of race, gender, disability, etc., but she also extends this circle of compassion to include non-human animals, further complexifying her argument and the messages she conveys to young readers.

10 responses to “Animality in Akata Witch”

  1. sarahweinberg24 Avatar
    sarahweinberg24

    This was a really interesting blog post! I didn’t make the connection between the sheep’s head and the labeling of non-magic humans as “Lambs” or the possible parallel with Black Hat. It suggests a much more tenuous for their magic/using it for the ‘correct’ purposes than I first considered, really blurring the line between living things. I also liked how these kids, who were a part of a Oha coven and destined for great things, were reminded that everything wants and deserves to be treated well, even if its not human. Although the wasp was a pretty minor part of the story, it carries this message of simple kindness and value of all life. Wasps are not something I want to see anywhere near me, but Okorafor turned this insect I associate with caution and a possibility of pain into a creature capable of artistic creation–which, like you mentioned, is not something seen in books often (I’m glad we watched that interview with Okorafor because I definitely see how her love of insects made it into the novel). Okorafor nicely interwove a lot of different messages into her novel and I think she did a pretty good job balancing them and creating these different layers where they intersect and interact.

    Like

  2. This is great! I obviously noted the amount of animals and animal imagery in the novel, but I didn’t think about them that much and it was really intriguing to see you put together the pieces. I don’t really have anything to add, other than the general underscoring of how amazing this work is and to thank you!

    Like

  3. I also didn’t make the connection between the sheep’s head Sunny needs to perform juju in the beginning and Lambs in general, but I’m really glad you pointed this out. In the novel, I also just really enjoyed the wasp character in general, and I find it interesting that Sunny’s friends who have had knowledge of the Leopard world for much longer find creatures such as the wasp just annoying in an ordinary way even though the creature is so unusual with such a strong personality, especially for an insect. Thank you for sharing!

    Like

  4. You made some connections that I really didn’t notice while reading the book! While reading, I also was thinking about how successful Okorafor was in incorporating multiple themes and lessons into the story. I am wondering if this was purposeful, or if these lessons were in the book by accident because together they made a good story.
    I think the idea that all life is important is especially salient to the present, since we are kind of in a time where society really focuses on humans. This idea of treating all life as equal is obvious in the section with Taiwo’s Nancy. However I did not recognize this same thing with the naming of non-leopard people as lambs and the depiction of the wasp. Your post was really interesting and brought to my attention some things I didn’t notice in the book!

    Like

  5. I really enjoyed this post. Nkedi is doing something truly intriguing with the animal-human dynamic. On the one hand, the animals are depicted as having (some) characteristics often read as human, like possessing creative drive, ambition, desires, and wants beyond the material. However, there is also, through Orlu’s commentary, the insistence that living beings are naturally imbued with the right to life, living, and happiness regardless of whether we like them, sympathize with them, understand them, or see them as human or human-adjacent. Which is interesting, seeing as most animal advocacy work relies on the personification of the human into something humanoid enough to warrant respect, care, compassion, and attention.

    Like

  6. I like your analysis of animality in this book. Like Sarah, I did not see the connection between the sheep’s head and the labeling of non-magic humans as “Lambs.” I also was interested in how the author uses animals to portray her point on the characters that are in the book and the general themes she wanted to pass on to the readers. I liked your post as it made me rethink the text in multiple ways.

    Like

  7. I agree with other commenters – I really liked your analysis of animality in this novel. I hadn’t even noticed that Sunny’s first spell involving a lamb mimics the Black Hat’s spells sacrificing young Leopard People – there’s this element of human/animal sacrifice that is big in magic (especially dark magic). It really shows the price of magic, and makes individuals question whether the magic accomplished is worth the cost.

    Like

  8. Like the other comments above, I had not made the connection between the literal sacrificial lamb’s head and the ‘lambs’ surrounding the main characters, or the parallels between the ‘good’ and ‘bad’ magic rituals.
    Your post also made me think about how the label ‘Lamb’ connotes the idea of being raised for slaughter, and how humans usually disregard signs of intelligence and emotions in animals that are perceived as lesser (cows, sheep, pigs, chickens, etc.), or not valued for their companionships (cats, dogs, rabbits, etc.). By superimposing the term ‘lamb’ on non-leopard people (like the readers), Okorafor confronts us with the idea of what it would be like to live our lives until a ‘higher being’, or more ‘intelligent’ being decided that we had served our purpose and were to be killed.
    It could also be that I’m reading too far into the topic, but that’s my two cents.

    Like

  9. I really agree with others commenting on this post. It’s a really interesting point you make here. I’m also with you on your comment about how you were astounded by the complex messages Nnedi portrayed in Akata Witch. I’m thinking about Marvel at the moment, and your post makes me think of Black Panther and how the two works Black Panther and Akata Witch each differently weave ‘African’ themes into the storyline!

    Like

  10. I also think its interesting to think about the associations these animals typically have in our society and how the author may be trying to lean in to those associations. For example– in calling the people without powers ‘lambs’ and also using the sheep’s corpse for magic, there is an association (especially in Christianity) one can draw upon with the usual association of lamb with innocence and purity and the sacrificing of lamb being the taking away of the innocence, do we see this line up with the book? Is our author leaning in to these associations?

    Like

Leave a comment